You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Making predictions under interventions: a case study from the PREDICT-CVD cohort in New Zealand primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Epidemiology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fepid.2024.1326306 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lijing Lin, Katrina Poppe, Angela Wood, Glen P. Martin, Niels Peek, Matthew Sperrin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 38% |
| Israel | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,500,798
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Epidemiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,920
of 328,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Epidemiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them