You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accuracy of Immunodiagnostic Tests for Active Tuberculosis Using Single and Combined Results: A Multicenter TBNET-Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0003417 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Delia Goletti, Carrara Stefania, Ornella Butera, Massimo Amicosante, Martin Ernst, Ilaria Sauzullo, Vincenzo Vullo, Daniela Cirillo, Emanuele Borroni, Roumiana Markova, Roumiana Drenska, José Dominguez, Irene Latorre, Claudio Angeletti, Assunta Navarra, Nicola Petrosillo, Francesco Nicola Lauria, Giuseppe Ippolito, Giovanni Battista Migliori, Christoph Lange, Enrico Girardi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 22% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2010.
All research outputs
#3,797,998
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#46,787
of 195,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,222
of 90,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#119
of 387 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 387 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.