You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Care Under Pressure 2: a realist synthesis of causes and interventions to mitigate psychological ill health in nurses, midwives and paramedics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Quality & Safety, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016468 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cath Taylor, Jill Maben, Justin Jagosh, Daniele Carrieri, Simon Briscoe, Naomi Klepacz, Karen Mattick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 185 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 76 | 41% |
| Ireland | 8 | 4% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 2% |
| Comoros | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 80 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 81 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 61 | 33% |
| Scientists | 39 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 38% |
| Researcher | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 13% |
| Psychology | 1 | 13% |
| Engineering | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#371,015
of 25,931,626 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#119
of 2,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,019
of 314,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,931,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.