↓ Skip to main content

Wound drainage after plastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wound drainage after plastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007258.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stojkovic CA, Smeulders MJ, Van der Horst CM, Khan SM, Stojkovic, Christa A, Smeulders, Mark J C, Van der Horst, Chantal M, Khan, Sameena M

Abstract

Wound drains are often used after plastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast, in order to reduce potential complications. It is unclear whether there is any evidence to support this practice and we therefore undertook a systematic review of the best evidence available.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Other 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Other 7 24%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 79%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Psychology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unknown 1 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,264,096
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,830
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,623
of 140,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#94
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.