↓ Skip to main content

EGN: a wizard for construction of gene and genome similarity networks

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
EGN: a wizard for construction of gene and genome similarity networks
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-13-146
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sébastien Halary, James O McInerney, Philippe Lopez, Eric Bapteste

Abstract

Increasingly, similarity networks are being used for evolutionary analyses of molecular datasets. These networks are very useful, in particular for the analysis of gene sharing, lateral gene transfer and for the detection of distant homologs. Currently, such analyses require some computer programming skills due to the limited availability of user-friendly freely distributed software. Consequently, although appealing, the construction and analyses of these networks remain less familiar to biologists than do phylogenetic approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 112 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Master 7 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 10%
Computer Science 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 16 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2014.
All research outputs
#3,621,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#960
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,952
of 206,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#19
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.