You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relationships between Mitochondrial Function and Metabolic Flexibility in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0051648 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tineke van de Weijer, Lauren Marie Sparks, Esther Phielix, Ruth Carla Meex, Noud Antonius van Herpen, Matthijs Karel C. Hesselink, Patrick Schrauwen, Vera Bettina Schrauwen-Hinderling |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 130 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 16% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 19% |
| Unknown | 25 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,825,616
of 24,326,994 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#22,886
of 209,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,521
of 296,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#530
of 5,165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,326,994 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 209,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.