↓ Skip to main content

Effect of partogram use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of partogram use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005461.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tina Lavender, Anna Hart, Rebecca MD Smyth

Abstract

The partogram (sometimes known as partograph) is usually a pre-printed paper form on which labour observations are recorded. The aim of the partogram is to provide a pictorial overview of labour, to alert midwives and obstetricians to deviations in maternal or fetal wellbeing and labour progress. Charts often contain pre-printed alert and action lines. An alert line represents the slowest 10% of primigravid women's labour progress. An action line is placed a number of hours after the alert line (usually two or four hours) to prompt effective management of slow progress of labour.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Unknown 257 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 25%
Student > Bachelor 47 18%
Student > Postgraduate 27 10%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Other 47 18%
Unknown 28 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 141 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 21%
Social Sciences 17 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 9 3%
Unknown 31 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,137,408
of 13,710,419 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,881
of 10,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,905
of 153,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,710,419 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.