↓ Skip to main content

Dispelling urban myths about default uncertainty factors in chemical risk assessment – sufficient protection against mixture effects?

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dispelling urban myths about default uncertainty factors in chemical risk assessment – sufficient protection against mixture effects?
Published in
Environmental Health, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-12-53
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olwenn V Martin, Scholze Martin, Andreas Kortenkamp

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Other 5 9%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,155,664
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#840
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,099
of 209,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.