You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Review of the Role of Food Insecurity in Adherence to Care and Treatment Among Adult and Pediatric Populations Living with HIV and AIDS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
AIDS and Behavior, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10461-013-0547-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sera Young, Amanda C. Wheeler, Sandra I. McCoy, Sheri D. Weiser |
| Abstract |
Adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) is critical for reducing HIV/AIDS morbidity and mortality. Food insecurity (FI) is emerging as an important barrier to adherence to care and treatment recommendations for people living with HIV (PLHIV), but this relationship has not been comprehensively examined. Therefore, we reviewed the literature to explore how FI may impact ART adherence, retention in medical care, and adherence to health care recommendations among PLHIV. We found data to support FI as a critical barrier to adherence to ART and to other health care recommendations among HIV-infected adults, HIV-infected pregnant women and their HIV-exposed infants, and child and adolescent populations of PLHIV. Associations between FI and ART non-adherence were seen in qualitative and quantitative studies. We identified a number of mechanisms to explain how food insecurity and ART non-adherence may be causally linked, including the exacerbation of hunger or ART side effects in the absence of adequate food and competing resource demands. Interventions that address FI may improve adherence to care and treatment recommendations for PLHIV. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 393 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Panama | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 388 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 87 | 22% |
| Researcher | 56 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 12% |
| Unknown | 97 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 57 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 55 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 5% |
| Psychology | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 43 | 11% |
| Unknown | 117 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,653,817
of 23,926,844 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#1,050
of 3,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,128
of 197,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#21
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,926,844 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.