↓ Skip to main content

Why we should worry less about predatory publishers and more about the quality of research and training at our academic institutions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Epidemiology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 918)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
96 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why we should worry less about predatory publishers and more about the quality of research and training at our academic institutions
Published in
Journal of Epidemiology, February 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.je.2017.01.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Wager

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 51 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 12 22%
Other 7 13%
Professor 7 13%
Student > Master 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 14 25%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Computer Science 3 5%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2020.
All research outputs
#610,673
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Epidemiology
#34
of 918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,429
of 424,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Epidemiology
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.