You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implications of Social Groups on Sedentary Behavior of Children with Autism: A Pilot Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-017-3037-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michaela A. Schenkelberg, Richard R. Rosenkranz, George A. Milliken, Kristi Menear, David A. Dzewaltowski |
| Abstract |
This pilot study compared sedentary behavior (SB) of children with autism (ASD) to typically developing peers (TD), and evaluated the influence of social contexts within free play (FP) and organized activity settings on SB of children with ASD during an inclusive summer camp. Participants with ASD were matched with TD peers by age and gender, and a modified OSRAC-P was utilized to assess SB and social context by setting. SB did not differ by diagnosis (ASD, TD), setting, or social contexts. In FP, children with ASD spent significantly more time in SB within social contexts compared to solitary contexts. ASD-related social deficits may facilitate SB in children with ASD during summer camp FP social contexts, compared to a solitary context. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 45% |
| Mexico | 1 | 9% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| Japan | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 23 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,766,568
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,873
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,323
of 426,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#39
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.