↓ Skip to main content

Role of twinnings in scaling up innovative solutions across Europe

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Innovations, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of twinnings in scaling up innovative solutions across Europe
Published in
BMJ Innovations, March 2024
DOI 10.1136/bmjinnov-2023-001141
Authors

Cláudia Campos, Robbin Kappelhof, Joana Carrilho, Luis Midão, Diogo Henriques, Elísio Costa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 5 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#17,540,466
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Innovations
#224
of 266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,050
of 266,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Innovations
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them