You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enhanced Archaerhodopsin Fluorescent Protein Voltage Indicators
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0066959 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yiyang Gong, Jin Zhong Li, Mark J. Schnitzer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 27% |
| Researcher | 33 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 28% |
| Neuroscience | 31 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 15 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,042,125
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#57,587
of 193,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,187
of 196,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,114
of 4,604 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,604 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.