You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Trees, forests and water: Cool insights for a hot world
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.01.002 |
| Authors |
David Ellison, Cindy E. Morris, Bruno Locatelli, Douglas Sheil, Jane Cohen, Daniel Murdiyarso, Victoria Gutierrez, Meine van Noordwijk, Irena F. Creed, Jan Pokorny, David Gaveau, Dominick V. Spracklen, Aida Bargués Tobella, Ulrik Ilstedt, Adriaan J. Teuling, Solomon Gebreyohannis Gebrehiwot, David C. Sands, Bart Muys, Bruno Verbist, Elaine Springgay, Yulia Sugandi, Caroline A. Sullivan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 473 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 44 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 28 | 6% |
| India | 18 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 13 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 11 | 2% |
| Canada | 10 | 2% |
| France | 9 | 2% |
| Germany | 9 | 2% |
| Spain | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 121 | 26% |
| Unknown | 201 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 418 | 88% |
| Scientists | 36 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 16 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,789 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Madagascar | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1778 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 300 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 257 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 244 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 152 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 87 | 5% |
| Other | 276 | 15% |
| Unknown | 473 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 516 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 239 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 134 | 7% |
| Engineering | 76 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 58 | 3% |
| Other | 181 | 10% |
| Unknown | 585 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 656. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#33,798
of 25,893,933 outputs
Outputs from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#17
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#673
of 327,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,893,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.