↓ Skip to main content

Strength training and aerobic exercise training for muscle disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strength training and aerobic exercise training for muscle disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003907.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicoline BM Voet, Elly L van der Kooi, Ingrid I Riphagen, Eline Lindeman, Baziel GM van Engelen, Alexander CH Geurts

Abstract

Strength training or aerobic exercise programmes might optimise muscle and cardiorespiratory function and prevent additional disuse atrophy and deconditioning in people with a muscle disease. This is an update of a review first published in 2004.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 182 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 19%
Student > Bachelor 31 17%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 16 9%
Other 38 21%
Unknown 25 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 18%
Sports and Recreations 16 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 37 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,015,121
of 14,597,689 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,967
of 11,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,121
of 154,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,597,689 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.