The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Engineering the Optical Response of the Titanium-MIL-125 Metal–Organic Framework through Ligand Functionalization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Chemical Society, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1021/ja405350u |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher H. Hendon, Davide Tiana, Marc Fontecave, Clément Sanchez, Loïc D’arras, Capucine Sassoye, Laurence Rozes, Caroline Mellot-Draznieks, Aron Walsh |
| Abstract |
Herein we discuss band gap modification of MIL-125, a TiO2/1,4-benzenedicarboxylate (bdc) metal-organic framework (MOF). Through a combination of synthesis and computation, we elucidated the electronic structure of MIL-125 with aminated linkers. The band gap decrease observed when the monoaminated bdc-NH2 linker was used arises from donation of the N 2p electrons to the aromatic linking unit, resulting in a red-shifted band above the valence-band edge of MIL-125. We further explored in silico MIL-125 with the diaminated linker bdc-(NH2)2 and other functional groups (-OH, -CH3, -Cl) as alternative substitutions to control the optical response. The bdc-(NH2)2 linking unit was predicted to lower the band gap of MIL-125 to 1.28 eV, and this was confirmed through the targeted synthesis of the bdc-(NH2)2-based MIL-125. This study illustrates the possibility of tuning the optical response of MOFs through rational functionalization of the linking unit, and the strength of combined synthetic/computational approaches for targeting functionalized hybrid materials. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 88% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 443 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 427 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 111 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 13% |
| Researcher | 54 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 64 | 14% |
| Unknown | 103 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 200 | 45% |
| Materials Science | 41 | 9% |
| Chemical Engineering | 25 | 6% |
| Engineering | 19 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 6% |
| Unknown | 123 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,285,676
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#9,828
of 67,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,672
of 207,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#99
of 577 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 577 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.