You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluating the Evidence for Lunar Calendars in Upper Palaeolithic Parietal Art
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cambridge Archaeological Journal, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.1017/s0959774324000155 |
Authors |
April Nowell, Paul Bahn, Jean-Loïc Le Quellec |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 8% |
Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 10 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
Scientists | 4 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 33% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 33% |
Lecturer | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 33% |
Psychology | 1 | 33% |
Engineering | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#983,737
of 25,840,929 outputs
Outputs from Cambridge Archaeological Journal
#35
of 401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,689
of 187,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cambridge Archaeological Journal
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,840,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.