↓ Skip to main content

Exagamglogene Autotemcel for Severe Sickle Cell Disease

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
506 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exagamglogene Autotemcel for Severe Sickle Cell Disease
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, April 2024
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa2309676
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haydar Frangoul, Franco Locatelli, Akshay Sharma, Monica Bhatia, Markus Mapara, Lyndsay Molinari, Donna Wall, Robert I Liem, Paul Telfer, Ami J Shah, Marina Cavazzana, Selim Corbacioglu, Damiano Rondelli, Roland Meisel, Laurence Dedeken, Stephan Lobitz, Mariane de Montalembert, Martin H Steinberg, Mark C Walters, Michael J Eckrich, Suzan Imren, Laura Bower, Christopher Simard, Weiyu Zhou, Fengjuan Xuan, Phuong Khanh Morrow, William E Hobbs, Stephan A Grupp

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 506 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Student > Master 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 13 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 416. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2024.
All research outputs
#72,780
of 26,020,829 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#2,097
of 32,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#803
of 281,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#25
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,020,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 123.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.