You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Exagamglogene Autotemcel for Severe Sickle Cell Disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa2309676 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Haydar Frangoul, Franco Locatelli, Akshay Sharma, Monica Bhatia, Markus Mapara, Lyndsay Molinari, Donna Wall, Robert I Liem, Paul Telfer, Ami J Shah, Marina Cavazzana, Selim Corbacioglu, Damiano Rondelli, Roland Meisel, Laurence Dedeken, Stephan Lobitz, Mariane de Montalembert, Martin H Steinberg, Mark C Walters, Michael J Eckrich, Suzan Imren, Laura Bower, Christopher Simard, Weiyu Zhou, Fengjuan Xuan, Phuong Khanh Morrow, William E Hobbs, Stephan A Grupp |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 506 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 145 | 29% |
United Kingdom | 23 | 5% |
Spain | 20 | 4% |
India | 13 | 3% |
Canada | 11 | 2% |
Germany | 11 | 2% |
France | 9 | 2% |
Australia | 7 | 1% |
Turkey | 6 | 1% |
Other | 55 | 11% |
Unknown | 206 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 307 | 61% |
Scientists | 138 | 27% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 51 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 13 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 25% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 13 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 416. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2024.
All research outputs
#72,780
of 26,020,829 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#2,097
of 32,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#803
of 281,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#25
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,020,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 123.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.