↓ Skip to main content

Structural and functional characterization of FabG4 from Mycolicibacterium smegmatis

Overview of attention for article published in ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION F (ELECTRONIC), April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 579)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structural and functional characterization of FabG4 from Mycolicibacterium smegmatis
Published in
ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION F (ELECTRONIC), April 2024
DOI 10.1107/s2053230x2400356x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xinping Ran, Prashit Parikh, Jan Abendroth, Tracy L. Arakaki, Matthew C. Clifton, Thomas E. Edwards, Donald D. Lorimer, Stephen Mayclin, Bart L. Staker, Peter Myler, Krystle J. McLaughlin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,692,168
of 25,990,612 outputs
Outputs from ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION F (ELECTRONIC)
#39
of 579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,705
of 263,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION F (ELECTRONIC)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,990,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 579 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them