The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,384 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Vitamin D regulates microbiome-dependent cancer immunity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.adh7954 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Evangelos Giampazolias, Mariana Pereira da Costa, Khiem C Lam, Kok Haw Jonathan Lim, Ana Cardoso, Cécile Piot, Probir Chakravarty, Sonja Blasche, Swara Patel, Adi Biram, Tomas Castro-Dopico, Michael D Buck, Richard R Rodrigues, Gry Juul Poulsen, Susana A Palma-Duran, Neil C Rogers, Maria A Koufaki, Carlos M Minutti, Pengbo Wang, Alexander Vdovin, Bruno Frederico, Eleanor Childs, Sonia Lee, Ben Simpson, Andrea Iseppon, Sara Omenetti, Gavin Kelly, Robert Goldstone, Emma Nye, Alejandro Suárez-Bonnet, Simon L Priestnall, James I MacRae, Santiago Zelenay, Kiran Raosaheb Patil, Kevin Litchfield, James C Lee, Tine Jess, Romina S Goldszmid, Caetano Reis E Sousa |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 197 | 6% |
| United States | 72 | 2% |
| Thailand | 46 | 1% |
| Japan | 15 | <1% |
| Canada | 11 | <1% |
| France | 8 | <1% |
| Spain | 7 | <1% |
| India | 7 | <1% |
| Australia | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 86 | 3% |
| Unknown | 2929 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2687 | 79% |
| Scientists | 412 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 234 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 51 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3798. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,424
of 26,377,159 outputs
Outputs from Science
#81
of 83,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15
of 339,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#1
of 429 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,377,159 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 429 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.