↓ Skip to main content

Leveraging natural capital accounting to support businesses with nature-related risk assessments and disclosures

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Leveraging natural capital accounting to support businesses with nature-related risk assessments and disclosures
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2024
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2022.0328
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Carter Ingram, Emily J. McKenzie, Kenneth J. Bagstad, John Finisdore, Rayne van den Berg, Eli Fenichel, Michael Vardon, Stephen Posner, Marta Santamaria, Lisa Mandle, Richard Barker, James Spurgeon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 12%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#21,097,296
of 25,914,360 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#6,647
of 7,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,389
of 229,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#44
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,914,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.