The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 146 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A climate-induced tree species bottleneck for forest management in Europe
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Ecology & Evolution, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41559-024-02406-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johannes Wessely, Franz Essl, Konrad Fiedler, Andreas Gattringer, Bernhard Hülber, Olesia Ignateva, Dietmar Moser, Werner Rammer, Stefan Dullinger, Rupert Seidl |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 7 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 96 | 66% |
| Scientists | 42 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 538. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2024.
All research outputs
#48,387
of 26,335,402 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#141
of 2,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#700
of 334,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#6
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,335,402 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 152.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.