You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The benefits of psychosocial interventions for cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-11-121 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zhen Guo, Hua-ying Tang, Hao Li, Sheng-kui Tan, Kai-hua Feng, Yin-chun Huang, Qing Bu, Wei Jiang |
Abstract |
Many patients with cancer experience depression and anxiety, and an associated decrease in quality of life (QOL) during radiation therapy (RT). The main objective of the study was to determine the benefits of psychosocial interventions for cancer patients who received RT. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 199 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 30 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 26 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 12% |
Researcher | 18 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
Other | 35 | 17% |
Unknown | 56 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 23% |
Psychology | 44 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 1% |
Other | 18 | 9% |
Unknown | 66 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,433,760
of 25,571,620 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#700
of 2,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,173
of 192,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#6
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,571,620 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.