↓ Skip to main content

Silphids in urban forests: Diversity and function

Overview of attention for article published in Urban Ecosystems, December 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Silphids in urban forests: Diversity and function
Published in
Urban Ecosystems, December 2004
DOI 10.1007/s11252-005-6836-6
Authors

Jordan M. Wolf, James P. Gibbs

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 63 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Student > Master 13 19%
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 7 10%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 63%
Environmental Science 11 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2011.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Urban Ecosystems
#349
of 727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,350
of 141,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urban Ecosystems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them