↓ Skip to main content

Pulmonary fibrosis after a new coronavirus infection – versions and controversies: A review

Overview of attention for article published in Terapevticheskiĭ arkhiv, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pulmonary fibrosis after a new coronavirus infection – versions and controversies: A review
Published in
Terapevticheskiĭ arkhiv, April 2024
DOI 10.26442/00403660.2024.03.202632
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evgeny I. Shchepikhin, Evgene I. Shmelev, Atadzhan E. Ergeshov

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,081,285
of 25,878,862 outputs
Outputs from Terapevticheskiĭ arkhiv
#120
of 459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,471
of 226,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Terapevticheskiĭ arkhiv
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,878,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 459 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them