The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Patterns of opioid use after surgical discharge: a multicentre, prospective cohort study in 25 countries
|
---|---|
Published in |
Anaesthesia, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.1111/anae.16297 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
TASMAN Collaborative |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
Turkey | 1 | 2% |
New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
Libya | 1 | 2% |
Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 39 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 31 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 20% |
Scientists | 4 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,349,130
of 26,266,588 outputs
Outputs from Anaesthesia
#776
of 5,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,770
of 322,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anaesthesia
#10
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,266,588 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.