The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-wide association analyses of breast cancer in women of African ancestry identify new susceptibility loci and improve risk prediction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41588-024-01736-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guochong Jia, Jie Ping, Xingyi Guo, Yaohua Yang, Ran Tao, Bingshan Li, Stefan Ambs, Mollie E. Barnard, Yu Chen, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Jian Gu, Jennifer J. Hu, Dezheng Huo, Esther M. John, Christopher I. Li, James L. Li, Katherine L. Nathanson, Barbara Nemesure, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Tuya Pal, Michael F. Press, Maureen Sanderson, Dale P. Sandler, Xiao-Ou Shu, Melissa A. Troester, Song Yao, Prisca O. Adejumo, Thomas Ahearn, Abenaa M. Brewster, Anselm J. M. Hennis, Timothy Makumbi, Paul Ndom, Katie M. O’Brien, Andrew F. Olshan, Mojisola M. Oluwasanu, Sonya Reid, Ebonee N. Butler, Maosheng Huang, Atara Ntekim, Huijun Qian, Haoyu Zhang, Christine B. Ambrosone, Qiuyin Cai, Jirong Long, Julie R. Palmer, Christopher A. Haiman, Wei Zheng |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 60% |
| Scientists | 14 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 19% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 29% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 29% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 326. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2024.
All research outputs
#108,318
of 26,370,058 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#160
of 7,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,418
of 324,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#7
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.