↓ Skip to main content

Differences in Phosphorus and Nitrogen Delivery to The Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
362 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in Phosphorus and Nitrogen Delivery to The Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, February 2008
DOI 10.1021/es0716103
Authors

Richard B. Alexander, Richard A. Smith, Gregory E. Schwarz, Elizabeth W. Boyer, Jacqueline V. Nolan, John W. Brakebill

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 19 7%
Canada 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 264 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 70 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 20%
Student > Master 56 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 7%
Other 67 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 112 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 42 14%
Engineering 29 10%
Unspecified 24 8%
Other 15 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2018.
All research outputs
#246,035
of 11,574,967 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#443
of 11,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,458
of 136,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#16
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,574,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.