You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marco Pautasso |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 953 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 90 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 81 | 8% |
| India | 27 | 3% |
| Australia | 23 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 22 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 21 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 20 | 2% |
| Mexico | 19 | 2% |
| Canada | 14 | 1% |
| Other | 221 | 23% |
| Unknown | 415 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 630 | 66% |
| Scientists | 255 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 42 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 26 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7,927 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 50 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 30 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 12 | <1% |
| India | 12 | <1% |
| Germany | 11 | <1% |
| Brazil | 11 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 10 | <1% |
| Belgium | 10 | <1% |
| Portugal | 10 | <1% |
| Other | 119 | 2% |
| Unknown | 7652 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1658 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 1369 | 17% |
| Researcher | 876 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 857 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 516 | 7% |
| Other | 1314 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1337 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1183 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 851 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 550 | 7% |
| Engineering | 542 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 441 | 6% |
| Other | 2721 | 34% |
| Unknown | 1639 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 627. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#36,548
of 25,923,151 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#27
of 9,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179
of 208,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#1
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,923,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.