You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Metastatic Grade II simple tubulopapillary mammary carcinoma in a free-living female maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência Rural, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0103-8478cr20230063 |
| Authors |
Ivam Moreira de Oliveira, Matheus de Oliveira Reis, Carolina de Oliveira Cata Preta, Maíra Meira Nunes, Daiane da Cruz Ferreira, Daniella Corrêa Abdalla, Samantha Mesquita Favoretto, Mary Suzan Varaschin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2024.
All research outputs
#16,238,870
of 26,107,981 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#272
of 2,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,704
of 369,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#29
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,107,981 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,290 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.