The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 122 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reconstructing an ancient fish: Three‐dimensional skeletal restoration of the head of Mawsonia (Sarcopterygii, Actinistia) using CT scan, and an adjusted model for body size estimation in fossil coelacanths
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Anatomy, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/joa.14054 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pablo Toriño, Hugo Dutel, Matías Soto, Walter Norbis, Víctor Ezquerra, Daniel Perea |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uruguay | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 101 | 83% |
| Scientists | 18 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#563,236
of 26,329,145 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anatomy
#68
of 2,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,199
of 320,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anatomy
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,329,145 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.