↓ Skip to main content

Normalizing RNA-Sequencing Data by Modeling Hidden Covariates with Prior Knowledge

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Normalizing RNA-Sequencing Data by Modeling Hidden Covariates with Prior Knowledge
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0068141
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Mostafavi, Alexis Battle, Xiaowei Zhu, Alexander E. Urban, Douglas Levinson, Stephen B. Montgomery, Daphne Koller

Abstract

Transcriptomic assays that measure expression levels are widely used to study the manifestation of environmental or genetic variations in cellular processes. RNA-sequencing in particular has the potential to considerably improve such understanding because of its capacity to assay the entire transcriptome, including novel transcriptional events. However, as with earlier expression assays, analysis of RNA-sequencing data requires carefully accounting for factors that may introduce systematic, confounding variability in the expression measurements, resulting in spurious correlations. Here, we consider the problem of modeling and removing the effects of known and hidden confounding factors from RNA-sequencing data. We describe a unified residual framework that encapsulates existing approaches, and using this framework, present a novel method, HCP (Hidden Covariates with Prior). HCP uses a more informed assumption about the confounding factors, and performs as well or better than existing approaches while having a much lower computational cost. Our experiments demonstrate that accounting for known and hidden factors with appropriate models improves the quality of RNA-sequencing data in two very different tasks: detecting genetic variations that are associated with nearby expression variations (cis-eQTLs), and constructing accurate co-expression networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 6%
Norway 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 161 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 36%
Researcher 37 21%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 5%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 9 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 19%
Computer Science 21 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Mathematics 5 3%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 14 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,234,337
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#27,217
of 224,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,479
of 208,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#659
of 4,718 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,718 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.