↓ Skip to main content

Use of hormonal contraceptives and HIV acquisition in women: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Infectious Diseases, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
27 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
24 X users

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of hormonal contraceptives and HIV acquisition in women: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidence
Published in
Lancet Infectious Diseases, July 2013
DOI 10.1016/s1473-3099(13)70155-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chelsea B Polis, Kathryn M Curtis

Abstract

Whether or not the use of hormonal contraception affects risk of HIV acquisition is an important question for public health. We did a systematic review, searching PubMed and Embase, aiming to explore the possibility of an association between various forms of hormonal contraception and risk of HIV acquisition. We identified 20 relevant prospective studies, eight of which met our minimum quality criteria. Of these eight, all reported findings for progestin-only injectables, and seven also reported findings for oral contraceptive pills. Most of the studies that assessed the use of oral contraceptive pills showed no significant association with HIV acquisition. None of the three studies that assessed the use of injectable norethisterone enanthate showed a significant association with HIV acquisition. Studies that assessed the use of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) or non-specified injectable contraceptives had heterogeneous methods and mixed results, with some investigators noting a 1·5-2·2 times increased risk of HIV acquisition, and others reporting no association. Thus, some, but not all, observational data raise concern about a potential association between use of DMPA and risk of HIV acquisition. More definitive evidence for the existence and size of any potential effect could inform appropriate counselling and policy responses in countries with varied profiles of HIV risk, maternal mortality, and access to contraceptive services.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Kenya 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 131 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Master 23 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Other 8 6%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 35 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 237. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2022.
All research outputs
#158,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#396
of 6,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#991
of 208,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#4
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 92.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.