↓ Skip to main content

BounTI (boundary‐preserving threshold iteration): A user‐friendly tool for automatic hard tissue segmentation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Anatomy, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
85 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
BounTI (boundary‐preserving threshold iteration): A user‐friendly tool for automatic hard tissue segmentation
Published in
Journal of Anatomy, May 2024
DOI 10.1111/joa.14063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marius Didziokas, Erwin Pauws, Lars Kölby, Roman H. Khonsari, Mehran Moazen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2024.
All research outputs
#840,640
of 25,974,666 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anatomy
#107
of 2,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,188
of 169,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anatomy
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,974,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.