↓ Skip to main content

Tethered Spinal Cord Syndrome Discovered during Ultrasound-guided Caudal Block

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesiology, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tethered Spinal Cord Syndrome Discovered during Ultrasound-guided Caudal Block
Published in
Anesthesiology, March 2024
DOI 10.1097/aln.0000000000004899
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ramón Eizaga Rebollar, Ana Isabel Carnota Martín, Elena Borreiros Rodríguez, Raquel Rojo Díez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2024.
All research outputs
#5,487,262
of 25,934,828 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology
#1,932
of 6,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,635
of 333,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology
#25
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,934,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.