↓ Skip to main content

The Idea of Legitimate Authority in the Practice of Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Idea of Legitimate Authority in the Practice of Medicine
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, February 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.sect1-1702
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arthur Isak Applbaum

Abstract

Legitimate authority is the normative power to govern, where a normative power is the ability to change the normative situation of others. Correlatively, when one has the normative power to govern others, these others face a normative liability to be governed. So understood, physicians do not have legitimate authority over their patients, and patients do not have legitimate authority over their physicians. An authority is legitimate only when it is a free group agent constituted by its free members. On this conception, associations of physicians sometimes have legitimate authority over individual physicians, and physicians sometimes count as members subject to the legitimate authority of these associations. This might be so even when they have not consented to membership.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Social Sciences 2 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Philosophy 1 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%