The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 318 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non-invasive spinal cord electrical stimulation for arm and hand function in chronic tetraplegia: a safety and efficacy trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41591-024-02940-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chet Moritz, Edelle C. Field-Fote, Candace Tefertiller, Ilse van Nes, Randy Trumbower, Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan, Mariel Purcell, Thomas W. J. Janssen, Andrei Krassioukov, Leslie R. Morse, Kristin D. Zhao, James Guest, Ralph J. Marino, Lynda M. Murray, Jill M. Wecht, Markus Rieger, Jared Pradarelli, Amanda Turner, Jessica D’Amico, Jordan W. Squair, Gregoire Courtine |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Peru | 3 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Paraguay | 2 | <1% |
| Panama | 2 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 283 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 286 | 90% |
| Scientists | 23 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 12 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 14 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1854. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,613
of 26,375,498 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#94
of 9,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91
of 317,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#5
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 108.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.