The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative efficacy of volume expansion, inotropes and vasopressors in preterm neonates with probable transitional circulatory instability in the first week of life: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Paediatrics Open, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002500 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Viraraghavan V Ramaswamy, Gunjana Kumar, Pullattayil Abdul kareem, Abhishek Somasekhara Aradhya, Pradeep Suryawanshi, Mohit Sahni, Supreet Khurana, Deepak Sharma, Kiran More, India; Clinical Practice Guidelines Group 2023 National Neonatal Forum, Saini Shiv Sajan, Kanithi Ravishankar, Dhir Shashi Kant, Kumar Praveen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 3 | 18% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 59% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 50% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2024.
All research outputs
#3,135,453
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Paediatrics Open
#148
of 739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,748
of 299,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Paediatrics Open
#2
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.