You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Investigating the acceptability of non-mesh, long-lasting insecticidal nets amongst nomadic communities in Garissa County, Kenya using a prospective, longitudinal study design and cross-sectional household surveys
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-015-0546-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Georgia R Gore-Langton, James Mungai, Nfornuh Alenwi, Abdulla Abagira, Owen M Bicknell, Rebecca Harrison, Farah A Hassan, Stephen Munga, Francis Njoroge, Elizabeth Juma, Richard Allan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 22% |
| Researcher | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2017.
All research outputs
#14,877,136
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,237
of 5,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,013
of 353,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#54
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.