↓ Skip to main content

Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
186 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004170.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Turner-Stokes L, Disler PB, Nair A, Wade DT

Abstract

Evidence from systematic reviews demonstrates that multi-disciplinary rehabilitation is effective in the stroke population, where older adults predominate. However, the evidence base for the effectiveness of rehabilitation following acquired brain injury (ABI) in younger adults is not yet established, perhaps because there are different methodological challenges.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 202 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 17%
Researcher 33 16%
Student > Master 33 16%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 48 23%
Unknown 19 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 32%
Psychology 32 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 11%
Social Sciences 21 10%
Neuroscience 16 8%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 28 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2013.
All research outputs
#3,014,523
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,417
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,729
of 144,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.