↓ Skip to main content

Establishing a health information workforce: innovation for low- and middle-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Establishing a health information workforce: innovation for low- and middle-income countries
Published in
Human Resources for Health, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-11-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenny H Ledikwe, Letitia L Reason, Sarah M Burnett, Lesego Busang, Stephane Bodika, Refeletswe Lebelonyane, Steven Ludick, Ellah Matshediso, Shreshth Mawandia, Mpho Mmelesi, Baraedi Sento, Bazghina-werq Semo

Abstract

To address the shortage of health information personnel within Botswana, an innovative human resources approach was taken. University graduates without training or experience in health information or health sciences were hired and provided with on-the-job training and mentoring to create a new cadre of health worker: the district Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Officer. This article describes the early outcomes, achievements, and challenges from this initiative.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 146 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 22%
Researcher 28 19%
Other 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 15%
Social Sciences 17 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 5%
Computer Science 7 5%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 34 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,140,637
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#575
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,353
of 207,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.