You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Challenges and practices in aligning requirements with verification and validation: a case study of six companies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Empirical Software Engineering, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10664-013-9263-y |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Bjarnason, Per Runeson, Markus Borg, Michael Unterkalmsteiner, Emelie Engström, Björn Regnell, Giedre Sabaliauskaite, Annabella Loconsole, Tony Gorschek, Robert Feldt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 4 | 67% |
| Norway | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 178 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 9% |
| Researcher | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 131 | 70% |
| Engineering | 18 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,997,001
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Software Engineering
#248
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,613
of 212,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Software Engineering
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.