↓ Skip to main content

Evidence to support phytosanitary policies–the minimum effective heat treatment parameters for pathogens associated with forest products

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence to support phytosanitary policies–the minimum effective heat treatment parameters for pathogens associated with forest products
Published in
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/ffgc.2024.1380040
Authors

Meghan K. Noseworthy, Eric A. Allen, Angela L. Dale, Isabel Leal, Esme P. John, Tyranna J. Souque, Joey B. Tanney, Adnan Uzunovic

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2024.
All research outputs
#23,425,734
of 26,099,501 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#739
of 1,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,600
of 157,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#17
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,099,501 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.