↓ Skip to main content

Anti-TNF-α treatment for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anti-TNF-α treatment for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008088.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

DongHao Lu, Huan Song, Gang Shi

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic, recurring condition that can develop during the reproductive years. It is characterised by the development of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. It is the most common cause of pelvic pain in women. This endometrial tissue development is dependent on oestrogen produced primarily by the ovaries and, therefore, traditional management has focused on suppression of ovarian function. Mounting evidence shows that altered immune function plays a crucial role in the genesis and development of endometriosis. In this review we considered modulation of the inflammation as an alternative approach.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 126 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 22%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Psychology 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 26 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,737,228
of 15,864,860 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,886
of 11,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,753
of 160,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#91
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,864,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.