↓ Skip to main content

Prevention of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: Is Simple Oral Hydration Similar To Intravenous? A Systematic Review of the Evidence

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevention of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: Is Simple Oral Hydration Similar To Intravenous? A Systematic Review of the Evidence
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0060009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Swapnil Hiremath, Ayub Akbari, Wael Shabana, Dean A. Fergusson, Greg A. Knoll

Abstract

Pre-procedural intravenous fluid administration is an effective prophylaxis measure for contrast-induced acute kidney injury. For logistical ease, the oral route is an alternative to the intravenous. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of the oral to the intravenous route in prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 74 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 15%
Other 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 21 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 58%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 24 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,334,636
of 24,373,273 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#17,099
of 210,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,211
of 201,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#389
of 5,333 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,373,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,333 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.