You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficient and stable solution-processed planar perovskite solar cells via contact passivation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aai9081 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hairen Tan, Ankit Jain, Oleksandr Voznyy, Xinzheng Lan, F Pelayo García de Arquer, James Z Fan, Rafael Quintero-Bermudez, Mingjian Yuan, Bo Zhang, Yicheng Zhao, Fengjia Fan, Peicheng Li, Li Na Quan, Yongbiao Zhao, Zheng-Hong Lu, Zhenyu Yang, Sjoerd Hoogland, Edward H Sargent |
| Abstract |
Planar perovskite solar cells made entirely via solution-processing at low temperatures (<150°C) offer promise for simple manufacturing, compatibility with flexible substrates, and perovskite-based tandem devices; however, they require an electron-selective layer that performs well with similar processing. We report a contact passivation strategy using chlorine-capped TiO2 colloidal nanocrystal (NC) film that mitigates interfacial recombination and improves interface binding in low-temperature planar solar cells. We fabricated solar cells with certified efficiencies of 20.1% and 19.5% for active areas of 0.049 and 1.1 square centimeters, respectively, achieved via low-temperature solution processing. Solar cells with efficiency >20% retained 90% (97% after dark recovery) of their initial performance after 500 hours continuous room-temperature operation at their maximum power point under one-sun illumination. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 25% |
| United States | 3 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 15% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Mongolia | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 80% |
| Scientists | 4 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1197 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 312 | 26% |
| Researcher | 176 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 141 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 68 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 64 | 5% |
| Other | 144 | 12% |
| Unknown | 302 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 256 | 21% |
| Chemistry | 172 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 130 | 11% |
| Engineering | 129 | 11% |
| Energy | 87 | 7% |
| Other | 71 | 6% |
| Unknown | 362 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 195. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#204,546
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Science
#5,884
of 83,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,486
of 425,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#92
of 1,133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.