↓ Skip to main content

Dissection of goadsporin biosynthesis by in vitro reconstitution leading to designer analogues expressed in vivo

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dissection of goadsporin biosynthesis by in vitro reconstitution leading to designer analogues expressed in vivo
Published in
Nature Communications, February 2017
DOI 10.1038/ncomms14207
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taro Ozaki, Kona Yamashita, Yuki Goto, Morito Shimomura, Shohei Hayashi, Shumpei Asamizu, Yoshinori Sugai, Haruo Ikeda, Hiroaki Suga, Hiroyasu Onaka

Abstract

Goadsporin (GS) is a member of ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs), containing an N-terminal acetyl moiety, six azoles and two dehydroalanines in the peptidic main chain. Although the enzymes involved in GS biosynthesis have been defined, the principle of how the respective enzymes control the specific modifications remains elusive. Here we report a one-pot synthesis of GS using the enzymes reconstituted in the 'flexible' in vitro translation system, referred to as the FIT-GS system. This system allows us to readily prepare not only the precursor peptide from its synthetic DNA template but also 52 mutants, enabling us to dissect the modification determinants of GodA for each enzyme. The in vitro knowledge has also led us to successfully produce designer GS analogues in vivo. The methodology demonstrated in this work is also applicable to other RiPP biosynthesis, allowing us to rapidly investigate the principle of modification events with great ease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 98 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 23%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 31%
Chemistry 22 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 23 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,195,423
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#25,717
of 50,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,109
of 425,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#469
of 873 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 873 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.