↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Toxicology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Genetic Toxicology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Welcoming Comments
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Introduction and Overview Chairman’s Comments
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Overview of Genetic Toxicology
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Introduction to an International Symposium on Genetic Toxicology — An Agricultural Perspective
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Health Risks and Exposure
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Approaches to the Genetic Safety Evalution of Agricultural Chemicals
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Bases for Concern Chairman’s Comments
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Patterns in Urban and Rural Cancer Incidence
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Cancer Risks Associated with Agriculture: Epidemiologic Evidence
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Extrapolation of Mutagenicity Testing to the Human
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Genotoxic Agents in the Agro-Ecosystem Chairman’s Comments
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Chemicals in the Egyptian Agricultural Environment
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Biological Characteristics of the Aflatoxin-Induced Hepatic Tumor
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Mechanisms of Dietary Modification of Aflatoxin B 1 Carcinogenesis
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Toxic Agents in the Agro-Ecosystem Chairman’s Comments
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Viruses as Environmental Carcinogens: An Agricultural Perspective
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Trace Elements and Teratology: An Interactional Perspective
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Pesticides as Environmental Mutagens
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Analysis of Toxicants in Agricultural Environments
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Exposure Assessment for Agricultural Chemicals
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Mutagens in Cooked Food
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Detection and Evaluation of Potential Hazards to Human Health Chairman’s Comments
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Study of Pesticide Genotoxicity
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Plant Dependent Mutation Assays
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Cytogenetic Studies of Agricultural Chemicals in Plants
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Cytogenetic Studies in Animals
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Detection and Evalutaion of Potential Hazards to Human Health (Second Session) Chairman’s Comments
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Dose Response Relations: The Effects of DNA Repair
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Mutation In Vivo in Human Somatic Cells: Studies Using Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Genetic vs. Nongenetic Chemical Carcinogenesis and Risk Assessment
  32. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 31 An Overview of Regulatory Responsibilities
  33. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 32 Toxicological Procedures for Assessing the Carcinogenic Potential of Agricultural Chemicals
  34. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 33 Mutagens, Carcinogens, and Anti-Carcinogens
  35. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 34 Roundtable Discussion Research Priorities and Perspectives: Industry, Universities, Government
Attention for Chapter 9: Cancer Risks Associated with Agriculture: Epidemiologic Evidence
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Cancer Risks Associated with Agriculture: Epidemiologic Evidence
Chapter number 9
Book title
Genetic Toxicology
Published in
Basic life sciences, January 1982
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4684-4352-3_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4684-4354-7, 978-1-4684-4352-3
Authors

Aaron Blair, Blair, Aaron

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 14%
Environmental Science 2 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#17,061,125
of 25,071,270 outputs
Outputs from Basic life sciences
#14
of 19 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,299
of 31,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Basic life sciences
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,071,270 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one scored the same or higher as 5 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them