You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cross-realm assessment of climate change impacts on species’ abundance trends
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Ecology & Evolution, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41559-016-0067 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diana E. Bowler, Christian Hof, Peter Haase, Ingrid Kröncke, Oliver Schweiger, Rita Adrian, Léon Baert, Hans-Günther Bauer, Theo Blick, Rob W. Brooker, Wouter Dekoninck, Sami Domisch, Reiner Eckmann, Frederik Hendrickx, Thomas Hickler, Stefan Klotz, Alexandra Kraberg, Ingolf Kühn, Silvia Matesanz, Angelika Meschede, Hermann Neumann, Robert O’Hara, David J. Russell, Anne F. Sell, Moritz Sonnewald, Stefan Stoll, Andrea Sundermann, Oliver Tackenberg, Michael Türkay, Fernando Valladares, Kok van Herk, Roel van Klink, Rikjan Vermeulen, Karin Voigtländer, Rüdiger Wagner, Erik Welk, Martin Wiemers, Karen H. Wiltshire, Katrin Böhning-Gaese |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 139 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 10% |
| Spain | 12 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 8% |
| Germany | 6 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 5 | 4% |
| Sweden | 4 | 3% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 51 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 90 | 65% |
| Scientists | 42 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 247 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 19% |
| Researcher | 48 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Professor | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 15% |
| Unknown | 55 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 94 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 66 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Unknown | 64 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 145. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2021.
All research outputs
#289,521
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#542
of 2,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,026
of 323,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#26
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 149.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.