You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Revisiting phylogenetic signal; strong or negligible impacts of polytomies and branch length information?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12862-017-0898-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rafael Molina-Venegas, Miguel Á. Rodríguez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 33% |
| Brazil | 2 | 13% |
| Romania | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 47% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 241 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 14% |
| Researcher | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 50 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 117 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 22 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 59 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,526,349
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#642
of 3,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,757
of 451,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#23
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.